“The Christmas wishes are early this year”, tweeted the renowned Dutch virologist Marion Koopmans in a sarcastic tone, followed by a quote from a hate mail that contained a torrent of abuse and called her a “filthy, dirty monster of Dachau”.
She followed this by tweeting “Shouldn’t we really start taking action to combat this kind of thing next year?” and tagged the Public Prosecution Service, the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences KNAW, university association UNL and D66 leader Sigrid Kaag. “I’ve really had enough, to tell you the truth.”
We’ve had enough too
“We’ve had enough too and we are certainly willing to take steps (always in consultation with you), and that includes going to the police and the courts”, replied Pieter Duisenberg, UNL chair.
Annelien Bredenoord, Rector of Erasmus University Rotterdam, where Koopmans works, also tweeted her support: “Threatening scientists is unacceptable. Threatening anyone is unacceptable.”
- Do you get involved in public debates on prickly issues such as vaccinations or climate change? Tips from people at TU Delft to avoid becoming immersed in social media storms.
D66 leader Sigrid Kaag also received a threatening Christmas card in her letterbox at home (“As you can see, we also know where you live”). She called on the anonymous writers to send cheerful holiday greetings to lonely people instead.
Last October, universities announced that they intend to file police reports more often. They also published guidelines for dealing with threats and intimidation directed at scientists.
It wasn’t only support that Koopmans received online. Unsurprisingly, she was also the target of new attacks, including accusations about being funded by China, which have since been thoroughly debunked as fake news.
On Monday morning, at an online meeting to discuss science during the COVID pandemic, KNAW president Ineke Sluiter addressed the issue of threats and intimidation. “Over the past two years, scientists have taken responsibility for enriching the public debate with their knowledge and expertise,” said Sluiter. “We encourage them to do so. But having ushered them into the wider world, we keenly feel how cold it can be out there.”
Alongside journalists and politicians, some researchers are facing threats, Sluiter said, especially if they become involved in sensitive subjects: not only the COVID pandemic, but also issues such as migration and colonial history. Women and minorities are even more likely to be threatened, she pointed out.
“It hollows out the public debate,” she asserted, appealing to the academic community to show support for their fellow researchers. “This is no time for irony. Don’t ask why someone is on television all the time. We need to support them, even if we don’t always agree with them.”
- Also read: What does TU Delft do if its researchers come under fire on social media for doing their work?
At the same meeting, internist Marcel Levi, chair of the Dutch Research Council NWO, demonstrated the incredible speed with which the scientific community has responded to the coronavirus pandemic. The illness was described within three weeks. In another three weeks, the genome of the virus had been unravelled and a mere six months later vaccine trials were ready to begin. The side effects of the vaccines were also quickly identified, he said, using an example from his own research.
HOP, Bas Belleman